As President Trump raises theover its nuclear and missile programs, the U.S. is putting on a show of force intended to convince the regime that it doesn’t stand a chance against the American military. There’s no doubt who would win, but the destruction would be horrendous for both sides, reports CBS News correspondent David Martin.
In an interview with Reuters two days before his 100th day in office, the president said he prefers a diplomatic solution, but “it’s very difficult.”
On Friday, North Korean state run television aired video of this week’s. It showed multiple rocket launchers and artillery firing. Leader Kim Jong Un and his officers cheered them on.
Just this past week, a nuclear-powered submarine armed with cruise missiles pulled into a South Korean port, a B-52 bomber patrolled over the Korean peninsula and the aircraft carriercame within striking range of North Korea.
The North Koreans put out propaganda videos threatening to sink the carrier, but the fact is, they would be unable to prevent a devastating attack. Despite such overwhelming firepower, experts like Sen. Jack Reed of the Armed Services Committee said there are no good military options for destroying North Korea’s nuclear weapons program.
“There are military options but they are risky. A comprehensive strike on nuclear facilities may precipitate a catastrophic retaliation against the civilian population of Seoul, or against our bases and service members in South Korea or Japan,” Reed said.
Nobody knows that better than the head of the pacific command, Adm. Harry Harris, who has the power to destroy North Korea, but not before thousands of artillery pieces and rocket launchers could unleash a barrage on the South Korean capital.
“Seoul is the most densely-populated city on the planet. Twenty-five million people in a relatively small area within artillery range of the…